Moreover, the minority of people who make those extreme poor choices shouldnt restrict the rights of the majority to eat, drink, make silly purchases or even gamble as they please. Some people may take $75 and buy an NFL team sweatshirt before their favorite teams game as a way to be a stakeholder. They are young, so they are still finding their way, but they should do so for their own benefit. If you lose, you may find the loss worth the entertainment value. Where we are allowed to pursue life, liberty and happiness and where we are endowed with certain rights that are ensured and protected by our Constitution. Our gaming laws are outdated and inconsistent with the rapid change of living in a global, connected world. The common-sense premise is that you have rights until they infringe on other peoples rights. Of course, there needs to be some regulation that complies with the normal operating laws of every business, but again, common sense principles should apply.
Related: Uber Cars Have Overtaken Yellow Taxis in New York City
Its a simple fact that people like to have a stake in the things they support. If you win, you may find yourself better off.
As the Attorney General of New York has filed an injunction against major DFS (Daily Fantasy Sports) sites including FanDuel and Draft Kings, a debate is being waged on whether fantasy sports is a game of chance or skill. But that needs to be their choice and their consequence to live with. You may even become worse off, but that should be your decision to make and your risk to calculate.
In our country, we have the freedom to earn money and to spend it on all kinds of things that others may find inane and wasteful. The participants in DFS contests and even online poker include very savvy number crunchers, who, if they feel that the platforms that they use are compromised or manipulated, will leave for another choice of platform. Allowing government to use that excuse is actually allowing someone else to interfere with and infringe upon our individual freedoms.
As for calls for significant regulation, I think that an industry like DFS that has grown very quickly and become very valuable can find a way to self-regulate. Overspending on clothing, eating too much and drinking too much are just some of the many ways that people can overindulge and hurt themselves. Your consequences are your own. Well, guess what? So have many other things. Their disruption is not that different than Airbnb and Uber that challenge heavy legacy regulation in the hotel and taxi industries, respectively. Someone else may want to take $75 and make a wager on the outcome of the same game to be a stakeholder. Its time for us to take a stand and demand that our right to make and spend our money as we choose not be infringed upon by the people who are supposed to protect our rights to begin with.
Related: Is Airbnb ‘Great for New York City?’ New York’s AG Definitely Doesn’t Think So.
. The government should be involved in creating rules and laws to ensure that one persons freedom does not take away from somebody elses. While I personally believe there is skill involved (not at all biased by my current second place standing in my own season-long NFL Fantasy Football league), I think it’s the wrong question. Its not the governments job or business in a free, secular country to decide which one of those personal expenditures is allowed.
The creators of DFS platforms are disruptive entrepreneurs, leveraging technology to create a new entertainment venue. And thats it.
Related: Why This Fantasy Sports Company Is a Dream Come True for Fans
When it comes to DFS or online poker or even to games of pure chance, the reality is that there is no infringing about those that infringes on any third party. We can buy overpriced handbags, gym shoes, homes and all kinds of impractical things. The question should be, Why isnt all online gaming legal?
We should push to make it so.
We live in a country where freedom is supposed to be a cornerstone principal.
I have heard the argument that gambling losses have negatively impacted lives for people who make bad decisions or become addicted to it. But if its our money, why should any government — whether local, state or federal — have a say in how we spend it or deem what we need protection from? In a country based on freedom, they shouldnt
More from my site
Latest posts by nanopart (see all)
- MLB, NFL, NBA ask court to block Delaware betting| Reuters - September 11, 2016
- A few do’s and don’ts when betting on football accumulators - September 11, 2016
- Top 10 Sports Colleges - September 10, 2016